Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Billy Budd: A Negative Piece?

  1. #1
    Mandryka Guest

    Default Billy Budd: A Negative Piece?

    Just been listening to Billy Budd, for the first time in about ten years (the Hickox recording).

    What strikes me now - and what certainly struck me the one time I saw the opera staged at Covent Garden - is the overall bleakness of the piece. The impression I get from the Epilogue is that Vere is trying desperately to take something of value from the terrible events he is remembering.....only because the alternative is to surrender to despair at Man's capacity for evil. For me, this makes...Budd quite a nihilistic piece.

    What does everyone else think?
    Last edited by Mandryka; 19-02-11 at 09:32. Reason: to remove a grammatical error!

  2. #2

    Default

    Confessional, Maybe?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Willesden Green, London NW2
    Posts
    14,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Newman View Post
    Confessional, Maybe?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XT_Ha...eature=related


  4. #4

    Default

    If I directed Billy Budd I would begin with Vere standing amongst shadowy people sitting in ranks. In the final scene I would play it the same way but gradually bring up the lights to reveal Vere at an Inquiry (rather like the present Iraq Inquiry)...the shadowy figures being the inquisitors and public.

    Budd pours his heart out and forgives Vere. Vere feels as guilty as hell. It is pure late Verdi.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Near Launceston, Cornwall
    Posts
    1,340

    Default

    My feeling is that how you see it will depend very much on your on take on "the meaning of life". I saw the WNO production with Thomas Allen as a student (1972-3?) and at that age believed that there was some transcendent being giving purpose to our lives. It wasn't too difficult to see Vere as having that belief and therefore seeing Budd's life and death as in some way redemptive. Now my belief in any sort of god or afterlife has vanished I agree with Mandryka that it becomes a much less positive experience, though perhaps I'd stop short of 'nihilistic'. Surely Britten's own uneasy relationship with Christianity or theism entitles us to see the message as more ambiguous, less didactic than that word implies?

    Chris Newman's staging idea looked OK at first glance, but don't we in any decent conventional 'solo' staging feel that Vere has in some sense been standing before a court of inquiry every minute of his life since Budd's execution? On reflection I'd stick with the solo version as less prescriptive, more open to our own undertandings and metaphors.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Not sure what you mean by 'negative' (or 'nihilistic'), Mandryka. Like much Britten, it focuses on the darker side of human existence. I find the ending uplifting (kind-of!) And, of course, Britten's music is as usual spellbinding.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    919

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimD View Post
    I find the ending uplifting (kind-of!) And, of course, Britten's music is as usual spellbinding.
    I agree. I think it can be seen as a kind of redemption 'He has saved me, and blessed me, and the love that passes understanding has come to me'. Britten might have been uneasy about Christianity, but he was steeped in it all the same, as was his librettist EM Forster. Billy can be seen as a Christ figure, but it's Britten, and you can take from it what you want. He didn't go in for the cut and dried - that's what I like!

    Must go back to the 'What makes you cry?' thread....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    13,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mary Chambers View Post
    He didn't go in for the cut and dried - that's what I like!
    Absolutely, Mary.

    I know Billy Budd quite well. I prefer the second half. Billy's doom and Vere's reaction can be very moving. But I don't find the tragedy / guilt thing markedly bleaker than in other tragic operas.

    The problem often seems to be how to play Claggart. It's so easy for him to be a two-dimensional villain, his vow to crush Billy seeming unconvincing. John Tomlinson was great at the ENO some years back - the hatred plainly being a twisted version of self-hatred when he couldn't cope with the effect Billy was having on him.
    "The isle is full of noises... Sounds, and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not"
    The Tempest, Act III scene 2 ll 148-9

  9. #9
    Mandryka Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caliban View Post
    Absolutely, Mary.

    I know Billy Budd quite well. I prefer the second half. Billy's doom and Vere's reaction can be very moving. But I don't find the tragedy / guilt thing markedly bleaker than in other tragic operas.

    The problem often seems to be how to play Claggart. It's so easy for him to be a two-dimensional villain, his vow to crush Billy seeming unconvincing. John Tomlinson was great at the ENO some years back - the hatred plainly being a twisted version of self-hatred when he couldn't cope with the effect Billy was having on him.
    I saw Tomlinson in the Barbican concert performance that preceded the Hickox recording.

    But I thought Eric Halfvorsen's performance at the ROH was more memorably intense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •