Many thanks for this very full response, Mandryka.
What I mean by your passive-aggressive stance can be gleaned by contrasting your two messages - one was full of half-references to who knows what, to a Daily Mail article from 2009, to your interesting opinions, scarcely alluded to in your intial piece, about the types of actor that you believe should be cast, why and how the
Back Drops version of the diaries (which
Back Drops wasn't apparently, we now learn) is in your view 'sanitised' etc. Each great claim required fleshing out, required that someone should ask you for clarification, rather than your offering it up at the first attempt. I know quite a bit about this because I've been accused of doing it by irritated friends in the past

I hope that I have explained it all adequately; your initial post irritated the pants off me but your reply is exemplary. Many thanks

