aye....I cringe whenever Ed M stands up in the chamber....The Establishment is still utterly untouched....and a few boys and girls from the grammar schools and red brick uni's have drawn their formica chairs up to the top table....
Full Member
aye....I cringe whenever Ed M stands up in the chamber....The Establishment is still utterly untouched....and a few boys and girls from the grammar schools and red brick uni's have drawn their formica chairs up to the top table....
Full Member
Indeed - thanks for the link.
Host
Here we go again, evidence threatened re Piers.
Do we need to start a new thread because it's Mirror Group?
http://onforb.es/nBbpyF
Full Member
You betcha, Red Rider!Originally Posted by Globaltruth
Host
Hmm - maybe not, turns out these were unguarded comments made on that white-hot centre of deep investigative journalism, Desert Island Discs in 2009; hardly a smoking gun, but may well be spun as such.You betcha, Red Rider!
Still Trinity Mirror's share price down (not as much as NI's yet) which does tend to stimulate internal action...
Host
The Mirror group's greatest scandal was (and probably always will be) the pension fund raid.
Oh, but wait a minute - that's what governments have been doing to public service pensions for years and now complain there isn't enough money to pay...
Full Member
It is indeed, onloy not only to public service pensions but to plenty of other pensions as well.The Mirror group's greatest scandal was (and probably always will be) the pension fund raid.
Oh, but wait a minute - that's what governments have been doing to public service pensions for years and now complain there isn't enough money to pay...
Host
e.g. mine!
..and no doubt many others ...
We are free to do anything we like as long as it is UNIMPORTANT
Full Member
The Guardian has put 14 questions to No 10 about the issue of Andy Coulson's vetting and No 10 has replied; both elements are contained in this article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/blog...tions#hackgate
Does anyone else share my view that the questions are reasonable and important; and that the answers are patronising, obfuscatory and signs of deep funk?
Full Member
Does anyone else share my view that the questions are reasonable and important; and that the answers are patronising, obfuscatory and signs of deep funk?
"Yes" to the first part, and "Did you really expect anything else?" to the second part.
Or to put it another way, "Do ursine creatures defecate in sylvan areas?"
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
