Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: Brian Sewell joins the throng!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Arles, France
    Posts
    977

    Default Brian Sewell joins the throng!

    More grist to the mill from one of my favourite grumpy old men in the Mail today:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...usic-ears.html

    It's all good publicity for our cause....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,922

    Default

    MickyD
    1. Well spotted.
    2. I wonder if BS has been following the forum. His vocabulary is rather familiar (not a bad thing at all)
    3. I didn’t know you were a Mail reader

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lowestoft
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    I normally keep the Mail as far away as possible. but this is invaluable to our cause and sensibly written. It is just a pity BS kept only to Breakfast as far as R3 was concerned, as there are of course other current examples of dross on the current R3 schedule.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Good old rumpus-causing Mr Sewell can always be depended on, though it's a shame the article's in that particular paper. I'm surprised, however, that he's raised no objections to Petroc's style. With his abrasive drawl, PT was the first of R3's 'upbeat', DJ-style presenters to hurt my early morning ears, followed a couple of years later by the even worse Sarah Mohr-Pietsch.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Arles, France
    Posts
    977

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by doversoul View Post
    MickyD
    1. Well spotted.
    2. I wonder if BS has been following the forum. His vocabulary is rather familiar (not a bad thing at all)
    3. I didn’t know you were a Mail reader
    doversoul - we all have our vices and I confess to visiting the DM site from time to time for some juicy scandal. Happily it sometimes throws up the occasional good article such as this one, but as Carmen has said, it would have been far more effective in a non-tabloid.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carmen View Post
    I'm surprised, however, that he's raised no objections to Petroc's style. With his abrasive drawl, PT was the first of R3's 'upbeat', DJ-style presenters to hurt my early morning ears, followed a couple of years later by the even worse Sarah Mohr-Pietsch.
    The whole article is "don't blame Petroc", who presumably has the misfortune of numbering Mr Sewell amongst his acquaintances, "and I'll lash out at a few other things to keep the mob on my side".
    I suspect there are better ways of getting the FoR3's point across than relying on fickle Daily Mail columnists.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,635

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MickyD View Post
    it would have been far more effective in a non-tabloid.
    The Times, Sunday Times and Telegraph have printed either letters or articles - two articles in the Telegraph. I believe the S Times plans something for when RW appears on Feedback.

    The Indie managed a review of which the writer was someone who listened to Radio 3 for a week but otherwise never listened to it and was quite approving; the Guardian's radio critic wrote a piece in which she quoted - so she said - this website (with a tinge a distaste), when in fact the quotes were taken from one of the Telegraph articles. And another Guardian journalist made himself 'unavailable' when I asked for a meeting (he gave the impression it was necessary to check with Roger Wright first). So, yes, it's a pity that the Indie and Guardian (in which Tom Service is the equivalent of the Telegraph's Michael White) show no interest, as yet.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,922

    Default

    Originally posted by Carmen
    though it's a shame the article's in that particular paper
    Originally posted by Word
    I suspect there are better ways of getting the FoR3's point across than relying on fickle Daily Mail columnists
    Oh, I don’t know. If MickyD can’t resist it, you never know who else might be dipping in from time to time (anyone on these boards?). Anyway the paper gets read by far more people than The G, The T and all the rest put together. Although how many of its regular readers bother to read an article about a radio station they never listen to is questionable, it is still a good thing. All besides, this might make some people curious and if they do decide to listen, they have this idea in their head that ‘this is not right, things should be much better’, which might make them want to join us. Ah well, one way of looking at it….

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Willesden Green, London NW2
    Posts
    13,940

    Default

    I'm afraid that I read 'thong' for 'throng' and now have to sponge down my screen which is pebble-dashed with AllBran

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Arles, France
    Posts
    977

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amateur51 View Post
    I'm afraid that I read 'thong' for 'throng' and now have to sponge down my screen which is pebble-dashed with AllBran
    Air on a G string, amateur!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •