Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 80

Thread: Richard Barrett CONSTRUCTION

  1. #51
    hackneyvi Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aka Calum Da Jazbo View Post
    i still have not listened, mostly because i have a problem with how long this piece appears to require to hear it .... i mean the Art of Fugue i somewhere arounf 1hr 50m
    Re sheer length, I have a similar feeling about Mahler. But with Bach, wouldn't we be accustomed to hearing excerpts from this; that whilst it is (an incomplete) whole, pleasure and satisfaction can be got from hearing parts.

    Which makes me think - I've got a hour before I need to go out and I might as well give Barrett my ear.

    Perhaps reason here is what mucks up the listening. We don't say we need to hear the whole thing to say what we might feel about a portion; but might be expected to hear the whole thing to make other kinds of judgement about it. But what are we judging if we're not judging our feelings about music?

    I suppose I mean that giving a thing of this length a fair chance doesn't have to mean listening to it in its entirety and, though its length has deterred me all week, on reflection I can't think why.
    Last edited by hackneyvi; 27-11-11 at 00:18. Reason: Poorly expressed point (which hasn't scrubbed up much better by editing).

  2. #52
    heliocentric Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boilk View Post
    Funny isn't it, how these avant garde über-serious composers write lots of stand-alone shortish pieces over several years, and then group them together as a vast cycle of works, presumably to make a more epic statement?
    The composer said in his introduction that it was planned as a single work from the very start, and it's clear from the Huddersfield Festival wesbite that it was also (unlike the Ferneyhough and Dillon examples you mention) commissioned as such. Did you listen to it? If so, what was there about it that gave it the "whiff" you mention? If not, what's with the pontificating?

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,616

    Default

    I think someone put up a link to the programme note somewhere - no? Can anyone help with finding it?

  4. #54
    hackneyvi Guest

    Default

    4 sections (?) form a micro-opera based on The Trojan Women;
    5 fragments which could form, if compiled, a violin concerto;
    10 sections (the remainder): half have electronics in the foreground, half have the instruments;
    All the parts run continuously or simultaneously or something.

    Utopian ideas and spontaneous and pre-planned thinking / action are er have um something to um do (wa diddy diddy dum diddy doo) with it er.

    An inspiration was Bacon - angular juxtapositions with disturbing events occuring within the setting.

    God um he er he's a ahh boring er oh-wa er speaker (but I appreciate er that he um that he er was er nervous um).

    The 9 members of his audience must have been quite overwhelming to confront.

  5. #55
    heliocentric Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hackneyvi View Post
    The 9 members of his audience must have been quite overwhelming to confront.
    I'm sorry but what evidence do you have for the size of the audience? since you obviously weren't there.

  6. #56
    hackneyvi Guest

    Default

    I'm about 15 minutes in and I think that the mini-opera might have started.

    So far, it's sounding pretty much like a new music parody.

    I'm reading Tolstoy at the moment and I think he would have despised this. It's not really making any mark on me at all, though, so far.

    Oh, wait though ... There's an unintelligible woman swooping in Greek that I fancy would be incomprehensible even if Greek was a language I spoke. She's starting to get on my tits.

  7. #57
    hackneyvi Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heliocentric View Post
    I'm sorry but what evidence do you have for the size of the audience? since you obviously weren't there.
    You're quite right, I wasn't there and the audience may have numbered in the thousands. But I fancied I could hear individual pairs of hands clapping in an echoic acoustic, which I took to be a sign of thin attendance.

    But size isn't everything.

    I've done 30 minutes and I feel ... it's of no interest to me.

  8. #58
    heliocentric Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hackneyvi View Post
    I fancied I could hear individual pairs of hands clapping in an echoic acoustic
    That would be because the main microphones used to pick up the general sound were right in the middle of the audience and therefore quite close to some pairs of hands, and I know that because I was there, and found the turnout not bad at all for a concert (the fourth in the festival that day IIRC) that everyone knew wouldn't end until quarter to one in the morning. What's more nobody left the auditorium during the performance. Not that any of that should mean that it ought to be of any interest to you of course. I just wonder why you make these cynical assumptions.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Hereford
    Posts
    4,373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hackneyvi View Post
    The 9 members of his audience must have been quite overwhelming to confront.
    I wasn't present either but I have to say that anyone incapable of deducing from the applause that the number of audience members must have been in three figures would have an aural capacity so limited as to enable him/her to derive very little from the music...

  10. #60
    John Skelton Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by french frank View Post
    I think someone put up a link to the programme note somewhere - no? Can anyone help with finding it?
    I linked to the hcmf website, ff

    http://www.hcmf.co.uk/Richard-Barret...l-CONSTRUCTION

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •