Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: BaL reviewers - a question of taste?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Willesden Green, London NW2
    Posts
    14,545

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alison View Post
    There have been comebacks from Richard Osborne, Robert Phillip and Geoffrey Norris -
    so why not Nicholas Anderson too ?
    I'm so glad that you mentioned Robert Philip, Alison. For me he's streets ahead of Richard Osborne because he seems to be able to take on a lot of recordings and make his way through them making sensible points either for or against as he goes wheras recently RO has rather loftily dismissed some recordings without a reasonable explanation as to why. I prefer RP's broadcasting voice too but that's a personal preference (actually it's an aversion to RO )

    What about Stephen Plaistow, a piano specialist and a rather good broadcasting style, I've always thought.

    Who else remembers & misses Joan Chisell the Schumann specialist?
    Last edited by amateur51; 07-12-11 at 21:33. Reason: else, innit

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,689

    Default

    I like Stephen Plaistow - and rather wish his repertoire extended to orchestral stuff too.

    Different class to Stephen Johnson and (especially) Edward Seckerson.

    Again he has the ability to talk and write interestingly about the music under review.

    So he reviews a batch of six piano discs - and I probably end up buying all of them !

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    Who else remembers & misses Joan Chisell the Schumann specialist?
    Me for one, am51. And what about Misha Donat (who doesn't seem to review that much on radio these days) and Jan Smazcny?

    I thought Michael Oliver was the nonpareil - incredible how R3 could have sidelined him.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amateur51 View Post
    I prefer RP's broadcasting voice too but that's a personal preference
    Am I the only one then who thinks he sounds like Victor Meldrew?

    I keep expecting him to say: "No exposition repeat! I don't believe it!"

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Near Ipswich
    Posts
    649

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aeolium View Post
    I thought Michael Oliver was the nonpareil - incredible how R3 could have sidelined him.
    Surely you know he died in 2002?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,095

    Default

    Of the younger generation, Peter Quantrill is surely the most promising.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rauschwerk View Post
    Surely you know he died in 2002?
    rauschwerk, I did know Michael Oliver died in 2002. I was referring to the way he was sidelined in the 1990s (as mentioned in Alan Blyth's obituary and earlier in this thread).

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by verismissimo View Post
    Of the younger generation, Peter Quantrill is surely the most promising.
    He's so good I struggle to keep up sometimes !

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    416

    Default

    Edward Greenfield did the odd spot, as did Michael Kennedy - and they were always a treat. In fact is the former still with us? I do hope so....

    K.
    "All else is gaslight" - Herbert von Karajan on the advent of digital recording techniques.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,689

    Default

    Both are still with us I believe.

    Ted is always good at conveying what a performance is actually like
    and cuts out all pseudo-intellectualism.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •