Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Poll - Who listens to "The Verb"?

  1. #31
    Lateralthinking1 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by french frank View Post
    On the subject of response, Lat should note that on average a thread might have 30 times more views than responses. The Verb thread was well above average with 50 times more views - so people were reading it even if they weren't replying.
    frenchfrank - Thank you for your kind comments and to those of aeolium too. I hope that the new approach will suffice in maintaining the interest of those who are keen and haven't written. If I hear anything that thrills me, you are still likely to hear about it. - Lat

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South-East Wales
    Posts
    7,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lateralthinking1 View Post
    If I hear anything that thrills me, you are still likely to hear about it. - Lat

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    west cornwall
    Posts
    5,313

    Default

    I like Ian McMillan's style and delivery - rarely listen to The Verb but if it were rescheduled to a more convenient hour I probably would. Radio 4 at 6.30pm instead of one of the dire comedy shows would be quite good!

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aeolium View Post
    I'd much rather have readings of poetry than discussions about it, which invariably (in my experience) reduce and detract from the work in some way.
    Although it wouldn't necessarily have to be an either/or. I was thinking of the occasional programme about 'Poetry'/Poets rather than a dissection of a particular work, with time for contemporary work as well as classics.

    I thought Venus and Adonis in the drama slot worked well and it's an ideal way to absorb such longer poems.

  5. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aeolium View Post
    I'd much rather have readings of poetry than discussions about it, which invariably (in my experience) reduce and detract from the work in some way.
    Gosh; it's the opposite for me. So often poems are ruined by an actorrr's sight-read "dramatic interpretation" - or by too-close mic-ing which amplifies breathing and masticatings.
    I prefer discussions on the lines of Discovering Music (mind you, look what happened to that!) A discussion "reduces" a poem, aeoli? How so?

    Best Wishes.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    So often poems are ruined by an actorrr's sight-read "dramatic interpretation"
    I agree, fhg, that can happen, though with good readers experienced in radio poetry can be a great experience for the listener. The alternative is not to have it read aloud at all, which is surely not the best way of experiencing a poem.

    What I meant when I said that a discussion often reduces a poem is that a fine poem is really untranslatable into prose, in its concision and unique sound patterns. A prose description of the meaning of a poem can never be a good substitute for hearing a poem, imo.

    I wouldn't mind a brief discussion of a poem, though not a line by line dissection, always provided that the whole poem was read.

  7. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aeolium View Post
    I agree, fhg, that can happen, though with good readers experienced in radio poetry can be a great experience for the listener.


    On the "Edward Lear" thread, somebody mentioned John Holmstrom's readings of The Dong with the Luminous Nose which I remember brought out an intense sadness that I'd never associated with the poem before.

    You are quite right: good readings of poems, by people with a passion for the work (and "radiogenic" voices), can say so much.

    Best Wishes.

  8. #38

    Default

    For some reason I found the most recent edition of The Verb to be enjoyable.
    Whilst lured over there by the promise of hearing Eliza Carthy 'live', I enjoyed a vinegary, and at times engagingly faltering rant from John Cooper Clarke, some translation work by Simon Armitage and a hackneyed but in parts amusing multi-vocal soliloquy from a Joe Bone.

    Ian McMillan appeared to take a 'less is more' approach with his own contribution or was that simply because I haven't listened for a while?

    I'll be adding it [back] to my regular listening schedule for a while. Recommended

    Over to Lat.....
    Last edited by Lateralthinking1; 20-01-12 at 17:09.

  9. #39
    Lateralthinking1 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Globaltruth View Post
    For some reason I found the most recent edition of The Verb to be enjoyable.
    Whilst lured over there by the promise of hearing Eliza Carthy 'live', I enjoyed a vinegary, and at times engagingly faltering rant from John Cooper Clarke, some translation work by Simon Armitage and a hackneyed but in parts amusing multi-vocal soliloquy from a Joe Bone.

    Ian McMillan appeared to take a 'less is more' approach with his own contribution or was that simply because I haven't listened for a while?

    I'll be adding it [back] to my regular listening schedule for a while. Recommended

    Over to Lat.....
    Thank you for these comments Global which I appreciate. Always good to hear Eliza - one of our best - and the rest of the programme wasn't too bad was it. Links to this programme and the one being broadcast tonight are going onto the main "Verb" thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •