Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Psalms used to settle court case in USA.

  1. #1

    Default Psalms used to settle court case in USA.

    Evidently an atheist in Florida hired a lawyer to bring a discrimination case against Christians and Jews and the observance of holy days. His argument was that it was unfair that atheists had no such recognised days.

    When the case came before the judge and after he had listened to the passionate presentation by the lawyer, he banged his gavel and declared the case dismissed.

    The lawyer objected to the ruling asking how the case could be dismissed as Christians had Christmas, Easter and others and the Jews had Passover, Yom Kippur and Hanukkah but his client and other atheists had no such holidays.

    The judge said " Yes they do. The calendar says April 1st is April Fool's Day. Psalm 14 verse 1 states ' The fool has said in his heart there is no God.' So it is the opinion of this court that if your client says there is no God he is a fool and April 1st is his day."

    What a very wise judge ( It is not April 1st ).

    VCC

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Peak District, England
    Posts
    1,869

    Default

    Very cute, VCC!

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnificat View Post
    Evidently
    The "evidence" being ... ?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
    The "evidence" being ... ?
    Quite !
    interesting use of the word "wise" IMV

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    954

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,904

    Default

    It "evidently" needs "faith" methinks

  7. #7

    Default

    Jean,

    I know, but I thought it would entice out Mr Gong Gong from his recent hiding place and give him a laugh.

    I thought it would cheer him up after such a bad week for the atheists. You know, Richard Dawkins being neatly skewered by Canon Giles Fraser and that fool of a councillor from Bideford who made such a fuss about prayers before council meetings and then rejoiced at the fact that he lost the main point of principle of his complaint and won on the detail of some obscure part of the Local Government Act that is about to be superseded anyway!!

    VCC

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnificat View Post

    I thought it would cheer him up after such a bad week for the atheists. You know, Richard Dawkins being neatly skewered by Canon Giles Fraser and that fool of a councillor from Bideford who made such a fuss about prayers before council meetings and then rejoiced at the fact that he lost the main point of principle of his complaint and won on the detail of some obscure part of the Local Government Act that is about to be superseded anyway!!

    VCC
    Strange how some people see the world ???
    Giles Fraser sounded a total idiot when I listened
    his whole argument seemed to be
    "Dawkins get's a title wrong ................. ergo god exists"

    clutching at straws more like !

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrGongGong View Post
    Strange how some people see the world ???
    Giles Fraser sounded a total idiot when I listened
    his whole argument seemed to be
    "Dawkins get's a title wrong ................. ergo god exists"

    clutching at straws more like !
    Mr GG

    No more idiotic than Dawkins saying that because you can't remember the name of the first book of the New Testament you can't be a Christian but it was good to hear his plea to God in his time of trouble!

    VCC

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnificat View Post

    The judge said "...Psalm 14 verse 1 states 'The fool has said in his heart there is no God.' So it is the opinion of this court that if your client says there is no God he is a fool and April 1st is his day."

    What a very wise judge.
    Why at a terribly unwise judge. Basing an "opinion of this court" directly from a statment in Psalms, he is ideologically aligning himself (and the court) with a book of the Hebrew/Christian bible, and against the plaintiff. His stance is supposed to be objective and non-partisan.

    In short, he's saying that non-believers must be fools because I'm with the believers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •