Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44

Thread: Rach 2 and 3

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Central London
    Posts
    12,921

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amateur51 View Post
    Horse's embouchure, surely Caliban?

    Who are you calling a horse's embouchure??!?!

    You come outside and say that!!!!

    "The isle is full of noises... Sounds, and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not"
    The Tempest, Act III scene 2 ll 148-9

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    liverpool uk
    Posts
    1,492

    Default

    Excellent insights Waldhorn!

    There's a famous example of pitch mismatch in Pretre's original recording in Paris of the Poulenc Organ Concerto, where the violins are sharp against the organ. Andrew Rose recently remastered it for a Pristine download using pitch-correction software ("Capstan") and very wonderful the 1961 recording now sounds on its first digital release.

    I remain very fond of the old Reader's Digest issues, latterly on excellent-sounding Chesky CDs, of Earl Wild and Jascha Horenstein with the RPO doing the Rachmaninov Concertos, including a fabulous high-speed and high-drama Paganini Rhapsody. The production/engineering team was the Gerhardt/Wilkinson one, so...

    Any involvement, Mr. Waldhorn?
    Quote Originally Posted by waldhorn View Post
    It's not a simple question of the piano being out of tune 'with itself'... I was playing on that recording in the old ( and much missed) Kingsway Halll, and remember it well.
    The piano, if you listen closely, is tuned to EXACTLY A=440 hz ( those were the days) but during the early 1970s there was a tendency for the LSO's overall pitch to 'creep up' higher than that, despite the best efforts of the superlative 1st oboe, Roger Lord.
    So, for much of the time, some of the woodwind ( not the oboes!) and strings are playing at about A=441hz .
    I was trying to 'stay with' Roger Lord, but now, 40-odd years later, my horn solos with the orchestra do sound a tad flat, but, dare I say it,quite well in tune with the piano in those few moments when the music turns into a 'piano/ horn' duet. ...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    546

    Default

    "Quote:
    Any involvement, Mr. Waldhorn?Unquote"

    No, sorry, no involvement there... although I was very active as a freelance player in London during the 1970s-1990s, the RPO and the BBCSO were the only two orchestras that never invited me to play with them.
    A friendly 'mole' in both those orchestras found out - and reported to me - that those orchestras considered my 'playing style' to be 'too eccentric'...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
    There's a famous example of pitch mismatch in Pretre's original recording in Paris of the Poulenc Organ Concerto, where the violins are sharp against the organ ... and very wonderful the 1961 recording now sounds on its first digital release.
    Is this a different performance to this one, Jayne? http://www.emiclassics.com/grocrelea....php?rid=20667

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    liverpool uk
    Posts
    1,492

    Default

    The more I look into Pristine's claim about a first re-release, the more I'm beginning to wonder if there hasn't been some historical confusion here.

    You see, on the EMI GROC the orchestra is listed as the Orchestre de la Societe des Concerts du Conservatoire - latterly the Orchestre de Paris. On the Pristine download (and on the original LPs - also I now find on a 1987 CD release...!) the listing is the French National Radio & TV Orchestra - latterly the French National Orchestra. But the organist is Durufle on the organ of the Church of Saint-Etienne on both... and they are both dated 1961! Shame I can't find an authoritative discography for Pretre.

    Two recordings in the same year with 2 different orchestras? Or an admin mishap somewhere in the intervening 50 years?
    Quote Originally Posted by Parry1912 View Post
    Is this a different performance to this one, Jayne? http://www.emiclassics.com/grocrelea....php?rid=20667

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chandler's Ford and Capiz
    Posts
    2,212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waldhorn View Post
    It's not a simple question of the piano being out of tune 'with itself'... I was playing on that recording in the old ( and much missed) Kingsway Halll, and remember it well.
    The piano, if you listen closely, is tuned to EXACTLY A=440 hz ( those were the days) but during the early 1970s there was a tendency for the LSO's overall pitch to 'creep up' higher than that, despite the best efforts of the superlative 1st oboe, Roger Lord.
    So, for much of the time, some of the woodwind ( not the oboes!) and strings are playing at about A=441hz .
    I was trying to 'stay with' Roger Lord, but now, 40-odd years later, my horn solos with the orchestra do sound a tad flat, but, dare I say it,quite well in tune with the piano in those few moments when the music turns into a 'piano/ horn' duet. ...
    I don't think this was (or is) unique to the LSO. A real worry for any conductor, because of pitch, is the Beethoven Emperor Concerto. You may have spent ages ensuring the tuning is right for the first three chords, but after the pianos cadenzas, it rests for nearly 100 bars as the orchestra plays the march. During this, the pitch of the strings and woodwind rises slightly, so that when the piano enters again with a full E-flat chord, it will actually seem flat. You have to encourage the woodwind to play flat over the last few bars if you want to avoid the piano sounding flat and dull. Very dangerous and difficult!

    The key doesn't help - strings especially are not too comfortable in flat keys and often drift towards a sharper one.
    Last edited by Pabmusic; 06-03-12 at 11:10.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    S.E. England
    Posts
    5,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waldhorn View Post
    "Quote:
    Any involvement, Mr. Waldhorn?Unquote"

    No, sorry, no involvement there... although I was very active as a freelance player in London during the 1970s-1990s, the RPO and the BBCSO were the only two orchestras that never invited me to play with them.
    A friendly 'mole' in both those orchestras found out - and reported to me - that those orchestras considered my 'playing style' to be 'too eccentric'...

    How very dare they.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,349

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pabmusic View Post
    strings especially are not too comfortable in flat keys and often drift towards a sharper one.
    that's interesting, I never knew that

    not sure I understand why they would be more likely to drift away from D flat major than C sharp major (for example)

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mercia View Post
    that's interesting, I never knew that

    not sure I understand why they would be more likely to drift away from D flat major than C sharp major (for example)
    because they aren't the same key maybe ?
    I'm forever disabusing students of these things ...............
    I'm not a string player but the ergonomics and tuning of string instruments mean that players are more comfortable in "sharp" keys , try giving them a whole tone scale to play and see the sweat

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,349

    Default

    I'm still not clear of the reason though

    are they less comfortable in C major than B sharp major ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •