No, it isn't terrible. I personally like it very much. I don't really understand the bad press it regularly gets (and certainly got), though one can see where it comes from [the "old fashioned" historical un-britten-like plot, the incorporation of mock-Tudor music, the necessary cast and the Elisabethan grandeur it needs to have to be successful]. But when even the Gloriana-suite is hardly performed, with really glorious (pun certainly intended) music, what are the chances for the opera?
As soon as a work of Britten's is "outside" the "normal" pattern of expectations, it is said to be terrible. That's how The Prince of the Pagodas, or the suite "A time there was" are perceived and received too, aren't they? Comparing Gloriana with e.g. (the IMO much weaker) The Rape of Lucretia, or Death in Venice shows what I mean.




) music, what are the chances for the opera?
Reply With Quote
