Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Herbie Hancock versus Ravel on 'In Tune'

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    548

    Default Herbie Hancock versus Ravel on 'In Tune'

    Did anybody hear the appalling Herbie Hancock monstrosity - travesty even, that Suzy Klein praised as 'beautiful playing' on 'In Tune', describing it at as being 'the 2nd movement of the Ravel G major Piano concerto'?

    It was definitely no such thing, it was an extract of a work called 'Piano Concerto in G' by 'Herbie Hancock' which turned out to be a jazzed-up version - none too tastefully - of the sublime 2nd movement of the beatific G major concerto by Ravel.
    The various fiddly and distracting bits of 'up-tempo' pianisms that he added to this masterpiece were, to me, quite sickening.
    I simply can't believe that Hancock's 'Concerto' doesn't infringe any laws of copyright!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,644

    Default

    But apart from that, waldhorn ... ?



    I wonder how it struck the jazz aficionados?

  3. #3

    Default

    heard a bit and was not persuaded to listen further....
    "Society is indeed a contract. It is a partnership in all science; a partnership in all art; a partnership in every virtue, and in all perfection. As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    371

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waldhorn View Post
    ... it was an extract of a work called 'Piano Concerto in G' by 'Herbie Hancock' which turned out to be a jazzed-up version - none too tastefully - of the sublime 2nd movement of the beatific G major concerto by Ravel.
    The various fiddly and distracting bits of 'up-tempo' pianisms that he added to this masterpiece were, to me, quite sickening.
    I simply can't believe that Hancock's 'Concerto' doesn't infringe any laws of copyright!
    If he added "fiddly and distracting bits of 'up-tempo' pianisms" and it was "jazzed-up" then I guess that may or may not circumvent the copyright issue. But it clearly doesn't infringe copyright laws if it (presumbly) had publisher permission for a recording by Decca. Now do you believe it?

    Incidentally, most of that CD contains Herbie doing Gershwin...and didn't Ravel order scores of any new Gershwin that came out? So Maurice might have been less sickened than Waldhorn at hearing this!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    not Storrington
    Posts
    448

    Default

    It is one of Rob Cowan's "Desert Island Discs" i.e. he regularly wheels it out either playing it straight or as an "innocent ear" piece (sic). Ms.Klein just nicked it from his box of CDs marked "favourites - play once a fortnight".
    O Wort, du Wort, das mir Fehlt!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •