Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: BaL 31.03.12 - Schubert's String Quartet No 14 "Death and the Maiden"

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    37

    Default

    A bizarre choice, and a somewhat careless BaL, with a lot of telling and not enough showing. He used 'sentimental' throughout as a dirty word, when sentiment is exactly what is needed in playing Schubert. Given how scrappy that Amadeus recording is, I thought it betrayed a degree of false sentiment on MD's part to choose it. Didn't the Belceas sound terrific?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by euthynicus View Post
    A bizarre choice, and a somewhat careless BaL, with a lot of telling and not enough showing. He used 'sentimental' throughout as a dirty word, when sentiment is exactly what is needed in playing Schubert. Given how scrappy that Amadeus recording is, I thought it betrayed a degree of false sentiment on MD's part to choose it. Didn't the Belceas sound terrific?
    The Amadeus - about the last I would choose ! Probably the most overrated quartet in history .

  3. #13

    Default

    ON what we heard, and their recent R3 concerts. the Belcea sound athletic, intelligent and smack on their game. Agreed.

    And MD's choices were maybe just a bit predictable and 'safe pair of hands choices that won't get me into trouble'?

    But The Lindsays have the kind of guts I like in my Schubert.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbirollians View Post
    The Amadeus - about the last I would choose ! Probably the most overrated quartet in history .
    Alas, my experiences of hearing them live and on record is the same as yours...I never really "got" the Amadeus.

    I love the Belcea performance - apart from one or two vintage versions (notably the original Juilliard record) and the Mosaiques for a terrific HIP view, it's probably my favourite.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,435

    Default

    How did the Quartetto Italiano get on ? Were they even mentioned ?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    2,151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbirollians View Post
    How did the Quartetto Italiano get on ? Were they even mentioned ?
    I don't think so - or the Juilliard.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Petter View Post
    I don't think so - or the Juilliard.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Petter View Post
    I don't think so - or the Juilliard.
    Italian Quartet were mentioned (very swiftly then dismissed). On the subject of access to the recording - am not sure why the CD review web-site lists the Amadeus version as unavailable when it's on itunes for £5.49. Not sure I'll be buying it though. I like my recordings of the Leipziger String Quartet and the Lindsays.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,109

    Default

    Italian Quartet were mentioned (very swiftly then dismissed).
    I have the Quartetto Italiano version and think it very good, though surpassed by their recording of the last quartet D887 (which was also casually dismissed in the BaL of that recently). I didn't hear this BaL - which were the eventual 'winners'?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,033

    Default

    The second Amadeus and the Busch.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •