Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Schubert - second poll questions

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,869

    Default Schubert - second poll questions

    I'm trying to think up some telling questions for the second poll. I think I can set this as multiple choice.

    Suggestions (up to 10):


    Altogether an impressive enterprise

    Plenty of interest, even for a Schubert fanatic

    Knew little of his music but now appreciate it more

    Good and less good content, but on balance engaging

    Good and less good content, and on balance off-putting

    Liked the general tone and presentation

    Much of the presentation and tone was irritating

    The schedule was confusing

    Like the total immersion coverage

    Hate the saturation coverage




    Five are broadly positive, five negative. Any better suggestions, keeping the same balance?

    I think it should be possible to vote for as many or few as you like.
    Last edited by french frank; 02-04-12 at 22:50. Reason: Updated with suggested changes

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    2,157

    Default

    Only immediate thought - Do the last two mean much the same thing?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Up in t'Pennines
    Posts
    503

    Default

    For the sake of balance, you should offer a positive option about the presentation and tone.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Peak District, England
    Posts
    1,883

    Default

    "Saturation" is a negatively loaded word. In fact, I don't think you need numbers 8 and 9 at all.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Simon View Post
    "Saturation" is a negatively loaded word. In fact, I don't think you need numbers 8 and 9 at all.
    I'll change the positive one to 'total immersion' then, which is the R3 term. Why don't you need those questions?

    Yes, to the other two ...

    OP updated (in a moment).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Peak District, England
    Posts
    1,883

    Default

    Given that we can vote for as many or as few as fit our views - I'd probably tick 3 boxes - I think it's very fair and that you've done a sterling job. The rewording seems to make things balance better.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    2,157

    Default

    Looks pretty good to me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    39

    Default

    I agree you've done a good job. The only thing that bothers me is that all of the suggestions assume listeners stayed tune during the whole week, when a lot of us tuned out for 200+ hours. But maybe you just want the poll to be for people who actually listened to all or part of it?

  9. #9
    hackneyvi Guest

    Default

    In both style and content, an impressive enterprise

    Good content and, on balance, engaging

    Although I knew quite a bit of Schubert's music, the week was of interest

    I knew something of his music and now appreciate it more

    Variable content and, on balance, off-putting

    I disliked the length of the coverage

    May or would have preferred the programmes as series

    The presentation and tone were engaging

    The presentation and tone were of varying effectiveness

    Much of the presentation and tone were off-putting
    I wouldn't suggest my efforts are better but they have a little more neutrality and therefore perhaps invite a little more reserve in responses. 'Hate' is an extreme word while 'dislike' covers a range negative reactions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •