
Originally Posted by
ferneyhoughgeliebte
Oh, everyone blames Boulez! (He's the default faulted.) Never mind Toscanini's performances in the '30s & '40s, never mind Ansermet's, never mind Desormiere's: it's all Boulez' fault! The simple matter is that earlier performances suffered from under-rehearsed orchestral players not being able to count or play quintuplets! (That and boxy Mono sound of the early recordings). Boulez was amongst the first to get players to play what was written and record it in decent stereo: there's no fundamental change in tempo, rhythm or texture than those recorded by Ansermet. The reason why modern performances sound "clinical" isn't because all subsequent conductors have kissed the feet of Boulez; it's because you're hearing it LIVE!
And Debussy was more influenced by the Symbolist poets than by the Impressionist painters: his visual preference was for the Japanese woodblock prints of Hokusai and others - try getting a "blurred and fuzzy" line with a woodcut!