Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 109

Thread: Torking Proply an' 'at

  1. #71
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chandler's Ford and Capiz
    Posts
    2,215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
    I'm with Scotty on this one. The OED and Collins compilers are completely out of touch, wishing we all spoke ancient Greek. Hardly anyone in Britain uses the -ize ending - just a handful of publishers, probably to help our American friends. In all official British documents, and on most road signs, you will find only the -ise endings.
    You have a point. Here's Michael Quinion (always a good authority imo): http://www.affixes.org/i/-ize.html

  2. #72

    Default

    well it seems to me that the 'proper' usage debates are one thing but what the Sun did quite another ... this mockery of a person's speech and language use by a national market share dominant tabloid is one of the key indictments of Murdoch in a non legal sense .... that his organisation is morally outrageous whether or not it broke or breaks the law ... and one might add that the defence of Murdoch by such as Shawcross and even White at the Graun miss the point .... his preservation of the press [he is seen as a saviour] is founded on the morally outrageous character of the man and his works
    "Society is indeed a contract. It is a partnership in all science; a partnership in all art; a partnership in every virtue, and in all perfection. As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”

  3. #73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aka Calum Da Jazbo View Post
    well it seems to me that the 'proper' usage debates are one thing but what the Sun did quite another ... this mockery of a person's speech and language use by a national market share dominant tabloid is one of the key indictments of Murdoch in a non legal sense .... that his organisation is morally outrageous whether or not it broke or breaks the law ... and one might add that the defence of Murdoch by such as Shawcross and even White at the Graun miss the point .... his preservation of the press [he is seen as a saviour] is founded on the morally outrageous character of the man and his works

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    6,229

    Default

    YES!

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Willesden Green, London NW2
    Posts
    13,923

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aka Calum Da Jazbo View Post
    well it seems to me that the 'proper' usage debates are one thing but what the Sun did quite another ... this mockery of a person's speech and language use by a national market share dominant tabloid is one of the key indictments of Murdoch in a non legal sense .... that his organisation is morally outrageous whether or not it broke or breaks the law ... and one might add that the defence of Murdoch by such as Shawcross and even White at the Graun miss the point .... his preservation of the press [he is seen as a saviour] is founded on the morally outrageous character of the man and his works

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,370

    Default

    After coming acoss the following article I could hardly resist the temptation to revive this thread ...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19670686

    Torking Equality, it would appear, is now being introduced on both sides of the, er, Pond ... innit?

  7. #77
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chandler's Ford and Capiz
    Posts
    2,215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scottycelt View Post
    After coming acoss the following article I could hardly resist the temptation to revive this thread ...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19670686

    Torking Equality, it would appear, is now being introduced on both sides of the, er, Pond ... innit?
    A bi'v aw'righ'.

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    S.E. England
    Posts
    5,226

    Default

    I've only read the last few posts but surely it's the other way round.We are using far more Ameericanisms than in the past.

    And when previously new to us American relatives visited they DID think we were fairly posh, which couldn't be further from the truth. It was an interesting visit from them, we both found out a lot about the other's language and what NOT to say

  9. #79
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chandler's Ford and Capiz
    Posts
    2,215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by salymap View Post
    ...We are using far more Americanisms than in the past.
    Unlikely. Quite literally thousands of our everyday words entered British English from America in the last 150 years. Here's a very small sample:

    commuter, snag, gimmick, babysitter, lengthy, sag, soggy, teenager, to butt in, hangover, blizzard, to fudge, stunt, joyride, currency (money), telephone, radio, raincoat, law-abiding, notify, to advocate, to take a backseat, graveyard, to stay put, to keep a stiff upper lip , to fly off the handle, to bark up the wrong tree, to pull the wool over one's eyes, to stub one's toe, to face the music, to knock spots off another, neither hide nor hair, to go haywire, con man, stag party, to be out on a limb, fit as a fiddle, to peter out, to pass out, to check in, to show off, to hold on, to highlight, to panic, to progress, to notice, to donate, to park, balance (remainder), census, standpoint, outhouse, immigration, reliable, influential

    We have been complaining about Americanisms since at least 1745, when the Englishman Francis Moore visited Savannah, which is situated on a hill "which they in barbarous English call a bluff".

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ludlow
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mangerton View Post
    Indeed. Notice in my workplace: Do not close this door for health and safety reasons

    So presumably it's permitted to close it for other reasons, but I'm not sure that's what they meant.
    Notices and signs!!

    On a car journey recently we saw this county road sign: HEREFORDSHIRE. YOU CAN. I am still wondering what I can do there........



    This was swiftly followed along the road by a sign outside a Pub " Sunday lunch served". But not eaten???

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •