Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 102

Thread: The joy of having one's preferences validated by a higher authority

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,894

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scottycelt View Post
    Sorry, Floss, maybe I just have this terrible 'phobia' about so-called 'experts' and 'higher authorities'....

    ... but I thought you accepted - more than most - One Particular Authority...

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    6,232

    Default

    But it really doesn't matter. We have learnt one another's music likes and dislikes over a period of time and will continue to do so. A pianist who doesn't like Liszt isn't right or wrong. It's a personal opinion - nothing more; nothing less.
    It's the same with critics and columnists. Their opinions are no more valid than yours or mine, but it's interesting to hear what they say.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vinteuil View Post
    ... but I thought you accepted - more than most - One Particular Authority...


    Harrison Birtwistle didn't like my piece
    Jo Kondo loved it

    who is the "higher authority" ?


  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South-East Wales
    Posts
    7,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aka Calum Da Jazbo View Post
    i recall admitting to a pathological aversion to Britten on the old boreds and at least two others confessed to a similar distaste ...
    One of which may have been me ..... and I still have the strong dislike. However, I also had an aversion to RVW, until I worked my way through the boxed set by Vernon Handley and the RLPO. Who is to say that I may not in time also overcome my aversion to Delius or Grainger, which is not a pathological aversion, merely ........ an aversion. Our tastes are not set in stone and are forever changing. I doubt however that I will change my opinion of Britten.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anna View Post
    One of which may have been me ..... and I still have the strong dislike. However, I also had an aversion to RVW, until I worked my way through the boxed set by Vernon Handley and the RLPO. Who is to say that I may not in time also overcome my aversion to Delius or Grainger, which is not a pathological aversion, merely ........ an aversion. Our tastes are not set in stone and are forever changing. I doubt however that I will change my opinion of Britten.
    I think my aversion to Britten is only partial - orchestral and chamber OK but anything with a voice in it, particularly if that voice is vibrato-laden and tenor.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,372

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vinteuil View Post
    ... but I thought you accepted - more than most - One Particular Authority...
    More than 'one' In matters of moral principle and the rule of law, of course, and whether that is 'more than most' and therefore a relatively eccentric standpoint might be open to some debate, even on a forum such as this ...

    In matters of taste and opinion, however, I most certainly do not accept Any Particular Authority ...

  7. #37
    Panjandrum Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrGongGong View Post


    Harrison Birtwistle didn't like my piece
    Jo Kondo loved it

    who is the "higher authority" ?

    How do you know Kondo wasn't just being polite?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Panjandrum View Post
    How do you know Kondo wasn't just being polite?
    He wanted it played as part of a concert of his pieces and some others with similar forces

    seemed good enough for me at age 22

  9. #39
    Panjandrum Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrGongGong View Post
    He wanted it played as part of a concert of his pieces and some others with similar forces
    To show off how good his composition was through the effect of contrast?

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    4,384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Panjandrum View Post
    To show off how good his composition was through the effect of contrast?
    That is mean
    From each according to his inability, to each according to his lazy greed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •