Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: What's wrong with a great composer

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,906

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aeolium View Post
    Wasn't this thread about Haydn at the Proms?
    indeed
    such an unknown composer
    deserves to have more exposure don't you think ?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,119

    Default

    deserves to have more exposure don't you think ?
    Yes, than he is getting this year or got last year

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,906

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aeolium View Post
    Yes, than he is getting this year or got last year
    There's nothing wrong with Haydn
    but to suggest that somehow there is a "vendetta" against playing his music
    is ridiculous ............

  4. #24
    Hornspieler Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ariosto View Post
    I absolutely agree with you - and I too think Haydn is a very under-rated composer. And I will happily go on playing his wonderful quartets until the end of time. (And some of them are damned hard technically too!)

    Best wishes - Ariosto
    Thanks for that, Ari.

    I have a very fine recording taken off-air of my wife's quartet playing Op. 76 NÂș 2 in D minor.

    Damned hard is putting it mildly. That 1st violin part is a killer - and the others also have it tough in places.

    With Haydn, there is no place to hide. (Play Haydnseek?)

    HS

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    371

    Default

    It's no coincidence that the nicknamed symphonies tend to be more popular, but it unfairly eclipses the the 'merely' numbered ones.

    Would be interesting to see some performance stats of nicknamed-versus-numbered for this genre over the last three centuries. The same goes for sonatas.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •