Originally posted by french frank
View Post
"Classical Live" was once Afternoon Concert
Collapse
X
-
I'm sure you're right. In fact Hans Keller wrote about this at length many years ago. In contrast he cited the musicans he'd known in Vienna and the depth of their knowledge of music, as a result of what he called 'active listening'. He also mentioned the case of Weber , who wrote a very accurate and detailed description of Beethoven's Fifth after hearng it once , without a score, a radically-original work and by a composer he didn't even admire.
I've tried to do thisi, for example,when hearing Proms premieres. It's very hard work!
Comment
-
-
That’s what all the surveys say. I think , depending on the time of day , as many as 80 percent of listeners are doing something else. At Breakfast , the peak radio audience , it’s at times about 100 per cent. By the evening the majority will be “active “listening but the absolute numbers are much smaller.Originally posted by Roslynmuse View Post
Or because they don't want silence. I am firmly convinced that many listeners don't listen, they just hear something in the background.
With TV many people now double screen - text and scroll / tweet / search while watching. I spend a bit of time on wiki trying to work out the plot from the episode summaries they have , or the menu if the cast are eating in a real life restaurant, or the filming location. The whole way media is consumed is rapidly evolving . A TV programme can be a launch pad for a variety of internet explorations - many of them readily monetisable.
When I find my mind wandering at a concert or, more often at the opera where the concentration spans are longer I try and work out the chords - quite easy in most Verdi operas and even easier in that Toccata from Orfeo on just now which only seemed to have two chords.
Comment
-
-
Even Petroc Trelawny claimed that most listeners to Breakfast were rushing around making sandwiches and hadn't time to listen to a 35-minute symphony, as an excuse for playing only one moveemnt. He didn't explain why they couldn't still listen to as much as they wanted if the whole symphony were played for those with more time.
Comment
-
-
I wonder how many of the Breakfast audience actually AREN'T rushing around making sandwiches.Originally posted by smittims View PostEven Petroc Trelawny claimed that most listeners to Breakfast were rushing around making sandwiches and hadn't time to listen to a 35-minute symphony, as an excuse for playing only one moveemnt. He didn't explain why they couldn't still listen to as much as they wanted if the whole symphony were played for those with more time.
Comment
-
-
Thing is you can make the sandwich during the first movement and listen to the rest. To be honest it’s perfectly possible to make a sandwich and listen to a symphony. I would agree that getting the kids off to school is more aurally demanding.Originally posted by smittims View PostEven Petroc Trelawny claimed that most listeners to Breakfast were rushing around making sandwiches and hadn't time to listen to a 35-minute symphony, as an excuse for playing only one moveemnt. He didn't explain why they couldn't still listen to as much as they wanted if the whole symphony were played for those with more time.
Comment
-
-
Blimey and knock me down with a feather . Just caught the words “Fifth Symphony “ and expecting Dah -Dah -Dah Daaah instead we got the much rarer opening of Malcolm Arnold’s . In its own way the opening is just as distinctive…Originally posted by LMcD View PostAn attractive playlist this afternoon (assuming they stick to it
)
Comment
-
-
I've almost worked my way through the box set of Arnold symphonies which I bought and mentioned recently and the answer to the (at least for me) important question 'do you want to hear this again?' is definitely 'yes'. The Andrew Penny set was recorded in the presence of the composer and the filler on the final CD is a discussion between conductor and composer.Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
Blimey and knock me down with a feather . Just caught the words “Fifth Symphony “ and expecting Dah -Dah -Dah Daaah instead we got the much rarer opening of Malcolm Arnold’s . In its own way the opening is just as distinctive…
Comment
-
-
And how different (in speed) is the performance of the fourth compared to Arnold's own on Lyrita!Originally posted by LMcD View Post
I've almost worked my way through the box set of Arnold symphonies which I bought and mentioned recently and the answer to the (at least for me) important question 'do you want to hear this again?' is definitely 'yes'. The Andrew Penny set was recorded in the presence of the composer and the filler on the final CD is a discussion between conductor and composer.
AP 37'47"
MA 54'11"
(I don't think it's a case of missing repeats.)
Comment
-
-
Perhaps they thought it was one way of getting the 3rd and 4th on 1 disc!Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
And how different (in speed) is the performance of the fourth compared to Arnold's own on Lyrita!
AP 37'47"
MA 54'11"
(I don't think it's a case of missing repeats.)
In which movements of the 4th is MA's version most strikingly different from Andrew Penny's (or vice versa)?
Comment
-
Comment