Originally posted by LMcD
View Post
The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place
Collapse
X
-
Needing to be absolutely certain of the facts as outlined in Wikipedia, I've accessed Fétis's Biographie universelle t. 6 (1840) pp 394-5, where he was first described as a 'mousquetaire noir' and also the French wiki which is precise:
"À partir de 1665, le roi impose la robe de leurs chevaux aux mousquetaires : ceux de la première compagnie doivent être montés sur des chevaux gris pommelés, et ceux de la deuxième compagnie sur des chevaux noirs. Les mousquetaires de la première compagnie sont pour cette raison surnommés Mousquetaires gris, et ceux de la deuxième compagnie Mousquetaires noirs ..."
Still working on whether his father was really a goldsmith named Josse ... [More follows]
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
You might be interested to see this, the court report in the Journal de Paris of the law suit brought against Meude-Monpas by the Duc d'Ailguillon who accused M-M of writing a pamphlet implying that the Duc dressed as a woman!Originally posted by french frank View PostNeeding to be absolutely certain of the facts as outlined in Wikipedia, I've accessed Fétis's Biographie universelle t. 6 (1840) pp 394-5, where he was first described as a 'mousquetaire noir' and also the French wiki which is precise:
"À partir de 1665, le roi impose la robe de leurs chevaux aux mousquetaires : ceux de la première compagnie doivent être montés sur des chevaux gris pommelés, et ceux de la deuxième compagnie sur des chevaux noirs. Les mousquetaires de la première compagnie sont pour cette raison surnommés Mousquetaires gris, et ceux de la deuxième compagnie Mousquetaires noirs ..."
Still working on whether his father was really a goldsmith named Josse ... [More follows]
Comment
-
-
The legend/rumour was that the duke had taken part in the Women's March that took place at the start of the French Revolution. Hence the Duke was rumoured to have dressed as a woman. Meude-Monpas admitted having written the poem in question but denied that Aiguill... referred to the duke. The Chronique de Paris mentions this, sneeringly, and Wikipedia has taken at face value the 'revelation' that M-M was not of noble birth:Originally posted by Roger Webb View PostYou might be interested to see this, the court report in the Journal de Paris of the law suit brought against Meude-Monpas by the Duc d'Ailguillon who accused M-M of writing a pamphlet implying that the Duc dressed as a woman!
"The Marquis de Condorcet's Chronique de Paris jeered at him and reminded the public that Meude-Monpas was a self-styled "chevalier" - in fact the son of a master goldsmith in Paris, a Mr. Josse "who would be amazed to see his youngest son has become a gentleman-servant and a chevalier (knight) in spite of his ancestors ..."
Hmm. M Josse, goldsmith, was a bit part in Molière's L'Amour médecin. When asked what would be a suitable gift for Sganarelle to give his daughter, Josse suggests jewellery (which he happens to sell in his shop). Sganarelle's response became a proverb: 'Vous êtes orfèvre, monsieur Josse', refers to someone giving advice which isn't wholly disinterested. Too much of a coincidence that !00 years later the Chronique de Paris mentions a M. Josse, orfèvre
- the chevalier de Meude-Monpas isn't all he claims to be. Perhaps. But there's little doubt that he was a mousquetaire noir.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Whatever next? Petroc T isn't really a Squire?!Originally posted by french frank View Post...
"The Marquis de Condorcet's Chronique de Paris jeered at him and reminded the public that Meude-Monpas was a self-styled "chevalier" - in fact the son of a master goldsmith in Paris, a Mr. Josse "who would be amazed to see his youngest son has become a gentleman-servant and a chevalier (knight) in spite of his ancestors ..."
...
Comment
-
-
Thanks FF, I had read about the goldsmith paternity but not about its possible Molière origin, but there seems precious little about him as a musician, or about his life after he left France. As I said he went to London and died in Hamburg - I read somewhere in 1806...looking again online there seems very little else to be known about him.Originally posted by french frank View Post
The legend/rumour was that the duke had taken part in the Women's March that took place at the start of the French Revolution. Hence the Duke was rumoured to have dressed as a woman. Meude-Monpas admitted having written the poem in question but denied that Aiguill... referred to the duke. The Chronique de Paris mentions this, sneeringly, and Wikipedia has taken at face value the 'revelation' that M-M was not of noble birth:
"The Marquis de Condorcet's Chronique de Paris jeered at him and reminded the public that Meude-Monpas was a self-styled "chevalier" - in fact the son of a master goldsmith in Paris, a Mr. Josse "who would be amazed to see his youngest son has become a gentleman-servant and a chevalier (knight) in spite of his ancestors ..."
Hmm. M Josse, goldsmith, was a bit part in Molière's L'Amour médecin. When asked what would be a suitable gift for Sganarelle to give his daughter, Josse suggests jewellery (which he happens to sell in his shop). Sganarelle's response became a proverb: 'Vous êtes orfèvre, monsieur Josse', refers to someone giving advice which isn't wholly disinterested. Too much of a coincidence that !00 years later the Chronique de Paris mentions a M. Josse, orfèvre
- the chevalier de Meude-Monpas isn't all he claims to be. Perhaps. But there's little doubt that he was a mousquetaire noir.
Comment
-
-
Tuned in briefly this morning for the 7.00 a.m. news summary - long enough to learn that (a) Mahler's 2nd is 'a monumental wall of sound' (shades of Phil Spector) and (b) the next piece to be played would be Mozart's 'Ave Virum Corpus' (possibly that of the late Charles Atlas).Last edited by LMcD; 04-08-25, 07:01.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostTuned in briefly this morning for the 7.00 a.m. news summary - long enough to learn that (a) Mahler's 2nd is 'a monumental wall of sound' (shades of Phil Spector) and (b) the next piece to be played would be Mozart's 'Ave Virum Corpus' (possibly that of the late Charles Atlas).
Or has 'Danish' stamped all over it!
Comment
-
-
Briefly OT again, I discovered something called [WARNING!] Wikimonde with an article which says he was born on 16 March 1756, with a ref.to the Paris archives. This checks with a readily available digital image, yet the date of birth is missing from the Wikipedia article - and there is no article at all in the French Wikipédia. Lots to research here!Originally posted by Roger Webb View PostThanks FF, I had read about the goldsmith paternity but not about its possible Molière origin, but there seems precious little about him as a musician, or about his life after he left France. As I said he went to London and died in Hamburg - I read somewhere in 1806...looking again online there seems very little else to be known about him.
WARNING - an enquiry of Google AI says Wikimonde is a very new domain which is suspicious, imitating Wikipedia but designed to mislead.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Interesting. Haven't come across Wikimonde...I'll test it out with a few other lesser-known composers. I subscribe a modest amount monthly to Wikipedia and have contributed to/corrected (!) several articles....but in a lot of cases, as it's an amalgam of knowledge/opinion, it is still susceptible to inaccuracies - as AI overview is, to an even more degree......I have a long-running discussion with several YouTube posters about the operation of loudspeaker crossovers - most of those posting videos on the subject haven't the technical background to understand, let alone instruct others, on their operation...and they don't half get shirty when told how they actually work!....as they back-up their statements with endorsements from AI Overview!Originally posted by french frank View Post
Briefly OT again, I discovered something called [WARNING!] Wikimonde with an article which says he was born on 16 March 1756, with a ref.to the Paris archives. This checks with a readily available digital image, yet the date of birth is missing from the Wikipedia article - and there is no article at all in the French Wikipédia. Lots to research here!
WARNING - an enquiry of Google AI says Wikimonde is a very new domain which is suspicious, imitating Wikipedia but designed to mislead.
Comment
-
-
The black musketeer is providing a rich vein of interest here. Given the number of his contemporaries who failed to note in their writings that he was of Black African origin, I wonder when the alternative fact was first published. The record is put straight in the See more ... to this YT of the VC No 4,
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Did he arrive at Dover by inflatable rubber galleon?Originally posted by french frank View PostThe black musketeer is providing a rich vein of interest here. Given the number of his contemporaries who failed to note in their writings that he was of Black African origin, I wonder when the alternative fact was first published. The record is put straight in the See more ... to this YT of the VC No 4,
Comment
-
A marvellous way of describing their regrettable current mindset.
Comment