I don't think that I do "overrate" either of Karajan's recordings of the Mahler #9 - and if Haitink's were the only recording of the work available to me, I'd stick with the score.
Mahler Symphony no. 9
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 21-06-19, 15:19.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
-
-
I did not suggest that you did re HvK. My analogy was with another relatively objective account unlike my favourites the 1938 and 1961 Walter and BPO/Barbirolli.Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostI don't think that I do "overrate" either of Karajan's recordings of the Mahler #9 - and if Haitink's were the only recording of the work available to me, I'd stick with the score.
But that is not the Thread title - I've given my "list" (which doesn't include Liszt) and appreciate that many, many people do not share my low opinion of Haitink's Mahler, and I do not begrudge them their inexplicable pleasures.
But I should have included his recordings of Richard Strauss in my list: an excellent Heldenleben, and very good Alpensinfonies and Rosenkavalier.
I would have thought that the Haitink was pretty unobjectionable being a rather wonderfully played pretty straight account . I should be interested to know why you have such a low opinion of it ?
Comment
-
-
But you said that the Karajan was "massively overrated". By whom?Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI did not suggest that you did re HvK. My analogy was with another relatively objective account unlike my favourites the 1938 and 1961 Walter and BPO/Barbirolli.
"Unobjectionable" and "pretty straight" are not what I want from a Mahler performance, no matter how "wonderfully played". Reading the score, there is so much intensity that the work demands - and gets from Karajan, Walter, Klemperer, Bernstein. As I said, if Haitink were the only recording available to me, I'd leave it and just listen to the score.I would have thought that the Haitink was pretty unobjectionable being a rather wonderfully played pretty straight account . I should be interested to know why you have such a low opinion of it ?
But this is not what the Thread is really about.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
The Karajan won Record of the Year in Gramophone did it not ?Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostBut you said that the Karajan was "massively overrated". By whom?
"Unobjectionable" and "pretty straight" are not what I want from a Mahler performance, no matter how "wonderfully played". Reading the score, there is so much intensity that the work demands - and gets from Karajan, Walter, Klemperer, Bernstein. As I said, if Haitink were the only recording available to me, I'd leave it and just listen to the score.
But this is not what the Thread is really about.
It leaves me utterly cold.
Comment
-
-
Yes.Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostThe Karajan won Record of the Year in Gramophone did it not ?
And .... ?
Yes, you've made that very clear, Barbs, and you're by no means the only one who responds in this way. Leaving aside the question as to whether a performance of this work ought to leave one feeling "warm", this does not make the recording/performance "massively overrated" - it only means that you do not respond to the astonishing insights that many others get from it. You do not "rate" it - that doesn't mean that others "overrate" it.It leaves me utterly cold.
But we won't agree on this - and it is, I'm sure you'll agree, out of place a Thread about "Favourite Haitink recordings"?
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Very well I was just interested as to why you dislike the Haitink so much and I am not sure still why.
I may not quite feel the same way as Derick Cooke did about it but it floats my boat in a way few Haitink recordings do - well apart from the fabulous Debussy records on Philips of course .
Comment
-
-
How many euphemisms for "dull" do you want?! (It doesn't so much "leave me cold" - and I am similarly baffled by why anyone should so react to Karajan's searing performance - as just leave me thinking how much better the work is in so many other recordings, and wishing I'd not wasted the 80mins of my life listening to it.)Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostVery well I was just interested as to why you dislike the Haitink so much and I am not sure still why.
Those Debussy recordings are exceptionally good.I may not quite feel the same way as Derick Cooke did about it but it floats my boat in a way few Haitink recordings do - well apart from the fabulous Debussy records on Philips of course .[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Am I right in thinking it's Karajan's Berlin Phil (DG) recording?Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebteKarajan's searing performance - as just leave me thinking how much better the work is in so many other recordings, and wishing I'd not wasted the 80mins of my life listening to it.)Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 21-06-19, 15:25.
Comment
-
-
Both of Karajan's BPO recordings of the Mahler #9 are on DG, visnick - the "intensely searing" version is a Live(-ish) recording from a couple of years after his Studio recording, which is just "ordinarily searing"Originally posted by visualnickmosAm I right in thinking it's Karajan's Berlin Phil (DG) recording?
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
I suppose I should give both a spin, but feel it is unlikely that either will displace RN and the Stuttgarters ('live' on Hänssler Classic) in my affections. The sheer emotional devastation presented in the final pages of their performance is, for me, unmatched.Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostBoth of Karajan's BPO recordings of the Mahler #9 are on DG, visnick - the "intensely searing" version is a Live(-ish) recording from a couple of years after his Studio recording, which is just "ordinarily searing"
Comment
-
-
Thanks. I'm just going to check whether mine is "intense" or "ordinary!"Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostBoth of Karajan's BPO recordings of the Mahler #9 are on DG, visnick - the "intensely searing" version is a Live(-ish) recording from a couple of years after his Studio recording, which is just "ordinarily searing"

Just checked, and it is (it says) 'Live recording from the 1982 Berlin Festival' Part of this evening's listening sorted. Thanks for the pointer.
Comment
-
-
See Gramophone, 7/84, for Richard Osborne's detailed comparison of the two Karajan Mahler 9ths.... he broadly preferred the later live one, taken from a 9/82 Berlin Festival Performance...but considers both to be outstanding achievements. (5/81 for the first DG one, 7/70 for the RCOA/Haitink).
The 1984 release was notable at the time for being CD-only, although still stretching across 2 discs.
There's a fascinating two-page reappraisal of Haitink's recently remastered Amsterdam Bruckner & Mahler Cycles in the present issue (7/2019) again by RO.
Interesting detail that producer Jaap van Ginneken monitored the recordings on Quad amps and Electrostatics, an important influence on their unflashy, natural excellence.Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 21-06-19, 16:23.
Comment
-
Comment