The Gramophone

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gradus
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 5878

    The Gramophone

    The magazine comes in for criticism from some eg Hurwitz who constantly attacks the magazine, but I happened to read a current copy today and was pleasantly surprised by the number of interesting articles and reviews that are succinct and informative. I didn't detect any particular bias or prejudice against the artists reviewed nor undue praise although John Wilson's new recording of the complete score of the operetta (so styled} My Fair Lady does get highly praised, probably justifiably given his excellent track record in musical theatre repertoire.
    I won't re-subscribe as I can read it as part of my annual Ipswich Institute subscription but I think the criticism seems overdone
  • pastoralguy
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 8460

    #2
    It’s certainly approved immeasurably in recent years and its arrival in my iPad is something I look forward to. One of my absolute favourite activities is to pick up an old cd in a charity shop, listen to it and look up the Gramophone review to see what they said about it.

    Being able to summarise a recording in prose is very skilled and it’s amazing how the writers can find the right words to describe how a performance is. I recently wrote about listening to the new Tetzlaff recording of the Elgar concerto and couldn’t really put my finger on how to describe it. I look forward to reading Gramophone’s review.

    Comment

    • richardfinegold
      Full Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 8518

      #3
      It seems like this topic pops up periodically on the Forum. Jayne used to be a passionate advocate.
      Hurwitz criticism derives from a past policy of advocating for UK artists. British readers may not even have detected the advocacy as it was more obvious to non Brits. As a regular reader I think that said bias has lessened over the past two years. W Hurwitz will always require a straw man target for his invective-he needs to rail against something to get clicks.
      Personally I prefer the columns dedicated to CD box releases, historical recordings, and reviewing old Gramophone reviews and reexamining the judgement of the historical reviewer

      Comment

      • Barbirollians
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 12698

        #4
        James Inverne nearly killed the magazine - Martin Cullingford has done a great job in recent years in restoring its reputation.

        Comment

        • silvestrione
          Full Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 1886

          #5
          Stuck at home after an operation, I read the most recent issue cover-to-cover, and was amazed at how good it was, A long informative article on Haydn in London, even a two-page piece on Boulez's Rituel. Something on Sir John Tomlinson...even the hi-fi man wrote a column about going out to live music, and did not refer to a single brand-name in it! Bold, and bold for the editor to allow it.

          Comment

          • pastoralguy
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 8460

            #6
            Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
            Stuck at home after an operation, I read the most recent issue cover-to-cover, and was amazed at how good it was, A long informative article on Haydn in London, even a two-page piece on Boulez's Rituel. Something on Sir John Tomlinson...even the hi-fi man wrote a column about going out to live music, and did not refer to a single brand-name in it! Bold, and bold for the editor to allow it.
            Get well soon!

            Comment

            Working...
            X