Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LMcD
    Full Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 10203

    Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
    I've just received an email from Uber, which has as the entry in the Reply To field in the header

    no-reply@replies.uber.com

    Can I reply or not, I wonder?
    (I happen not to want/need to!)
    You can try, but I don't think you'll get very far. If you're lucky, you might get a message telling you that the email address to which you wrote is not monitored.

    Comment

    • Pulcinella
      Host
      • Feb 2014
      • 12448

      From Guardian online:

      Downing Street has said the BBC is not corrupt nor institutionally biased, as the corporation comes under intense pressure for its coverage of a range of issues.

      I'd write or, not nor, unless I added 'is it' (i.e., is not corrupt, nor is it institutionally biased).
      Is this a case of what I think is called something like mistaken overcorrection?

      Comment

      • smittims
        Full Member
        • Aug 2022
        • 5944

        Well, I don't think so. I say 'not... nor...' . ''Or..' I think of as positive, e.g. 'either this... or that...' ; 'nor' as a negative : 'neither this,... not that...'

        I had it corrected to ' not.. or...' in drafts I prepared for others to sign (30 years ago...) , but I stand firm on this. I care not for Fowler..

        Comment

        • oliver sudden
          Full Member
          • Feb 2024
          • 1208

          Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
          From Guardian online:

          Downing Street has said the BBC is not corrupt nor institutionally biased, as the corporation comes under intense pressure for its coverage of a range of issues.

          I'd write or, not nor, unless I added 'is it' (i.e., is not corrupt, nor is it institutionally biased).
          Is this a case of what I think is called something like mistaken overcorrection?
          It’s also a bit on the ambiguous side to my eye. Is the intense pressure just backdrop, or is it cited by Downing St as evidence for the preceding comment?

          Comment

          • Serial_Apologist
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 39198

            Originally posted by smittims View Post
            Well, I don't think so. I say 'not... nor...' . ''Or..' I think of as positive, e.g. 'either this... or that...' ; 'nor' as a negative : 'neither this,... not that...'

            I had it corrected to ' not.. or...' in drafts I prepared for others to sign (30 years ago...) , but I stand firm on this. I care not for Fowler..
            "Neither...............nor..", as the opposite of "either....or", was what we were taught.

            And while on the subject, does anyone say "Eether" or "Neether" these days, as opposed to "Eyether" and "Nyther"?

            Comment

            • smittims
              Full Member
              • Aug 2022
              • 5944

              I still hear 'eether... neether' north of theTrent.

              Comment

              • Pulcinella
                Host
                • Feb 2014
                • 12448

                Originally posted by smittims View Post
                Well, I don't think so. I say 'not... nor...' . ''Or..' I think of as positive, e.g. 'either this... or that...' ; 'nor' as a negative : 'neither this,... not that...'

                I had it corrected to ' not.. or...' in drafts I prepared for others to sign (30 years ago...) , but I stand firm on this. I care not for Fowler..
                I think of 'corrupt or biased' as a single expression, covered by the simple 'not'.
                The carpet is not yellow or green; it's blue.
                The carpet is neither yellow nor green; it's blue.

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 32071

                  Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
                  From Guardian online:

                  Downing Street has said the BBC is not corrupt nor institutionally biased, as the corporation comes under intense pressure for its coverage of a range of issues.

                  I'd write or, not nor, unless I added 'is it' (i.e., is not corrupt, nor is it institutionally biased).
                  Is this a case of what I think is called something like mistaken overcorrection?
                  Yes. The 'not' merely negates the adjective corrupt. It doesn't cast the entire sentence as a negative statement. It could say 'The BBC is not corrupt, nor is it ..." where the negative refers back to the verb in both clauses.

                  PS I say eye-ther.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Pulcinella
                    Host
                    • Feb 2014
                    • 12448

                    Actually, the heading of the section uses 'or'!

                    BBC not corrupt or institutionally biased, Downing Street says


                    Downing Street has said the BBC is not corrupt nor institutionally biased, as the corporation comes under intense pressure for its coverage of a range of issues.

                    I don't know how long this link will work as it's effectively rolling news:

                    Comment

                    • Pulcinella
                      Host
                      • Feb 2014
                      • 12448

                      Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post

                      "Neither...............nor..", as the opposite of "either....or", was what we were taught.

                      And while on the subject, does anyone say "Eether" or "Neether" these days, as opposed to "Eyether" and "Nyther"?
                      I say both eether and eyether, depending on the following word, I think.

                      Eether one is acceptable.....but take eyether of them.
                      Isn't that strange?

                      Comment

                      • gurnemanz
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 7650

                        A phrase I do dislike is is 'me neether" instead of "Neyether do I".

                        Comment

                        • vinteuil
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 13938

                          ... my idiolect uses 'eyether'

                          'Eether' is, as linguisticians would have it, in my competence but not my performance...

                          Comment

                          • Serial_Apologist
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 39198

                            Originally posted by gurnemanz View Post
                            A phrase I do dislike is is 'me neether" instead of "Neyether do I".

                            Comment

                            • Pulcinella
                              Host
                              • Feb 2014
                              • 12448

                              Originally posted by gurnemanz View Post
                              A phrase I do dislike is is 'me neether" instead of "Neyether do I".
                              That's odd too; if you're happy with 'Me too', why not with its complement 'Me neither'?
                              Maybe (depending on context), 'Nor me'?

                              Think of 'Moi aussi' and 'Moi non plus', too.
                              I'm not sure what the equivalent expressions are for 'Ich auch' and 'Anch'io' (Anche io).

                              Comment

                              • Serial_Apologist
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 39198

                                Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post

                                That's odd too; if you're happy with 'Me too', why not with its complement 'Me neither'?
                                Maybe (depending on context), 'Nor me'?

                                Think of 'Moi aussi' and 'Moi non plus', too.
                                I'm not sure what the equivalent expressions are for 'Ich auch' and 'Anch'io' (Anche io).
                                "I also" or "I as well", except that we say "me too", as you point out, although presumably it's grammatically incorrect, "me" being accusative.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X