Originally posted by Darkbloom
View Post
Applause....I know, I know..........
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
I'm sure we have all heard people engage in a demented competition to be the first person to shout 'bravo' at the end of a performance. Sometimes I wonder if they were really listening at all and just wanted an opportunity to show off. That's odious of course and deserves criticism. I don't know the performance you mention, but I recall being at the Rattle Mahler 8 when one single voice yelled 'wow' at the end of the first movement and everyone around him looked rather embarrassed. I thought it was simply a moment of spontaneous emotion. Perhaps you were there and found it annoying, but it didn't bother me at all.Originally posted by PhilipT View PostQuite a few years ago there was a "Bravo!" from near the front of the Arena at the end of the first movement of the Dvorak Piano Concerto (played by Garrick Ohlsson). Can I be churlish about that?
I am not about to tell people how they should behave, but I think there are moments when a spontaneous expression of excitement is fair enough. It all depends on the circumstances. Sometimes the costive silence you can get between movements seems more out of place than applause to me. I don't know whether Tchaikovsky intended applause at the end of the Pathetique third movement but you usually get it. Perhaps it makes the despair of the last movement all that more vivid coming straight after?
Comment
-
-
You look to have a dangerously high colour yourself, GongersOriginally posted by MrGongGong View PostHow are we doing on the hypertension front chums?
Still up in the high hundreds?
Or is this confessional having the desired effect?
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostThere's got to be applausible explanation...
Comment
-
-
-
But it's the purists, those who are emulating the behaviour of the audiences of old, who are offering approbation between separate movements of a multi-movement work, surely? Not that much of a purist myself, but good luck to those who are, say I.Originally posted by maestro267 View Post... I'm beginning to feel that a lot do it now because they know it annoys the purists.Last edited by Bryn; 06-08-15, 19:41.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostBut it's the purists, those who are emulating the behaviour of the audiences of old, who are offering approbation between separate movements of a multi-movement work, surely? Not that much of a purist myself, but good luck to those who are, say i.
Did they clap between movements when the Scratch played?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostBut it's the purists, those who are emulating the behaviour of the audiences of old, who are offering approbation between separate movements of a multi-movement work, surely? Not that much of a purist myself, but good luck to those who are, say I.

I don't think enough people grasp this point.
Comment
-
-
I seem to recall they did between the various movements of the suite from Sweet F.A. when it was given in a cinema in the Tirol. John Tilbury's vocal rendition of "Why doesn't everyone go underground" went down especially well, as I recall. Oh, and there was plenty of applause between the various parts (movements?) of Christan Wolff's Burdocks at Cecil Sharp House, but that did not only involve the Scratch. Just about every experimental music performing group in London at that time took part.Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
Did they clap between movements when the Scratch played?
Comment
-


Comment