Originally posted by Beef Oven
View Post
What Rock/Pop/Jazz-rock/Fusion/Prog/Experimental etc album are you listening to?
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Beef Oven
Originally posted by Boilk View Post
It was the Bruford albums (having been a Yes fan) that launched me into fusion ... subsequently followed the careers of Stewart, Holdsworth and Annette Peacock. Have seen all three live in London doing their own thing too! Also Bruford whilst in KC and Earthworks modes.
And what about the amazing Jamie Muir? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiRJoXLvjPs
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven View PostWow! Bruford in KC, if only I could have been at one of those gigs - I envy you!
And what about the amazing Jamie Muir? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiRJoXLvjPs
Comment
-
Beef Oven
Originally posted by Boilk View PostI gather the Yes alumnus learnt (learned?) a lot from Muir - probably covered in BB's recent highly acclaimed autobiography. If you like Bruford and King Crimson, you'll likely adore (as do I) the David Torn album Cloud About Mercury. Quite unlike other fusion of the era, and with Bruford and Levin on board as co-writers/improvisers, that's the more experimental 50% of 1980s KC! I thought the lean-and-disciplined anarchy of KC's 1982 Beat couldn't be topped, then this fusion wildcard came my way...
I bought the Bruford autobiography 2/3 years ago, but I am so reverent towards Mr Bruford that I will only open it when I am sure I can give it my total attention and finish it in a maximum of two sittings. I have therefore been unable to read a single sentence to this day!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven View PostI bought the Bruford autobiography 2/3 years ago, but I am so reverent towards Mr Bruford that I will only open it when I am sure I can give it my total attention and finish it in a maximum of two sittings. I have therefore been unable to read a single sentence to this day!
Comment
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View Post(Prog /country Rock fusion was never a successful genre.. perhaps its time is yet to come)
One myth perpetrated which really annoys me is when commentators, who ought to know better, say that Punk came along as a backlash to the Prog "dinosaurs" ... utter nonsense! 3-chord punk became near-extinct within a couple of years (quickly morphing into New Wave so we're told), and Prog was too off-the-radar for most punk artists to be able to revolt against (just look at those 1970s episodes of ToTP to see how niche it was). Some of Prog's biggest commercial successes (Yes's Drama and 90125 and Asia's Asia) came along AFTER Punk's heyday, and in the case of those Yes albums, still contained songs far too long for mainstream airplay, so happily not every prog band did a radio-friendly reinvention a la Genesis.
Comment
-
Boilk, it was the fusion of prog rock and country rock that never took off !! (unless I missed some Gentle Giant album recorded in Nashville !!)
I would never diss prog....my elders and betters at school could never get enough of it, and I have the scars to prove that it is better than punk !!
I do fail to grasp how you can suggest that punk wasn't a reaction to things like prog rock, though, when it quite clearly was,at least in part, and plenty of punks at the time said so.People like me who listened to punk certainly thought it was.
The fact that some prog rock was produced after 1977 is surely irrelevant ? As for sales, well some Prog sold well, and so did some punk.Last edited by teamsaint; 27-05-12, 21:29.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostBoilk, it was the fusion of prog rock and country rock that never took off !! (unless I missed some Gentle Giant album recorded in Nashville !!)
I would never diss prog....my elders and betters at school could never get enough of it, and I have the scars to prove that it is better than punk !!
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostI do fail to grasp how you can suggest that punk wasn't a reaction to things like prog rock, though, when it quite clearly was, at least in part, and plenty of punks at the time said so. People like me who listened to punk certainly thought it was.
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostThe fact that some prog rock was produced after 1977 is surely irrelevant?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boilk View PostCompletely disagree that is was "never a successful genre" - many albums sold in the millions, in both the 70s and 80s. It certainly outsold punk and many post-punk outfits.
One myth perpetrated which really annoys me is when commentators, who ought to know better, say that Punk came along as a backlash to the Prog "dinosaurs" ... utter nonsense! 3-chord punk became near-extinct within a couple of years (quickly morphing into New Wave so we're told), and Prog was too off-the-radar for most punk artists to be able to revolt against (just look at those 1970s episodes of ToTP to see how niche it was). Some of Prog's biggest commercial successes (Yes's Drama and 90125 and Asia's Asia) came along AFTER Punk's heyday, and in the case of those Yes albums, still contained songs far too long for mainstream airplay, so happily not every prog band did a radio-friendly reinvention a la Genesis.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostAt last someone else who didn't get punk - it was not refreshing it was awful and very poor musically. .
you might not like the aesthetic but many punk bands were very tight musically speaking
the whole "sex pistols" can't play myth was very successful as a marketing tool
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostReally ?
you might not like the aesthetic but many punk bands were very tight musically speaking
the whole "sex pistols" can't play myth was very successful as a marketing tool
Comment
Comment